Officially, India has not signed an agreement to
participate or enforce the U.S. FATCA legislation. Short for the Foreign
Account Tax Compliance Act, FATCA requires foreign banks to become the
eyes and ears for the IRS. That means beginning this year, offshore
banks must examine their account base and next year, report to the IRS
accounts with ties to the United States. Banks that do not comply face
stiff sanctions.
Without an agreement, Indian banks could find themselves in
jeopardy. India, however, appears to be moving towards compliance. In
late June, the Reserve Bank of India notified all Indian banks that India had agreed to the basic terms of FATCA.
Although the Indian government says it will comply,
implementation will be difficult. Part of the problem is that Indian tax
returns don’t already capture all of the information necessary for
FATCA.
The current Indian Annual Information Return collects the following data:
Cash held in a savings account: $15,000 (equivalent USD)
Mutual fund investment: $3000 (equivalent USD)
Investment accounts: $1500 (equivalent USD)
My counterparts in India tell me that the government’s
proposed finance budget proposes to replace the Annual Information
Return with a new Statement of Financial Transactions and Reportable
Accounts (SFTRA).
The proposed SFTRA form would require financial
institutions to report those same accounts that the IRS seeks under
FATCA. In other words, the new SFTRA form would mirror the reporting
obligations under FATCA.
Why is this relevant? The largest group of foreign
reporting clients in the US is Indian. Many are dual nationals while others are
Indian born American citizens or professionals here on work visas and
green cards. There is a misconception in the Indian American community
that India will not comply with FATCA. I think it will.
Even if India ultimately does not ink a deal with the U.S.
Treasury, American prosecutors and IRS agents are still free to pursue
individual Indian banks and they have. Both HSBC India and ICICI are
rumored to already be cooperating with the IRS.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.