The Charges
83 year-old Kramer was charged with conspiring to defraud the U.S. and one of its agencies (the IRS). Counts included the following:
· Attempt to evade or defeat tax. By willfully and knowingly attempting to evade and defeat a substantial part of his income taxes, Kramer was in violation of Title 26, U.S.C. §7201,
a felony punishable by fines of up to $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of
a corporation), or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, plus
the costs of prosecution.
· Conspiracy to Commit Offense or to Defraud the United States. Kramer conspired with UBS to evade detection and assessment of taxes, a violation of Title 18, U.S.C. §371, which is punishable by fines or imprisonment of not more than five years, or both.
· Subscribing to False Individual Tax Returns. Kramer was charged under Title 26, U.S.C. §7206(1)
for willfully and knowingly signing tax returns, which are verified by
written declarations made under penalties of perjury although he knew
that those statements were false. This is a felony punishable by fines
of up to $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or
imprisonment of not more than 3 years, or both, plus the costs of
prosecution.
· Committing an offense by commanding another to perform illegal acts.
Directing UBS to engage in acts intended to defraud the U.S. led to
charges against Kramer as the principal party in the crimes under 18 U.S. Code §2.
In
addition to a large amount of back taxes, Kramer has been ordered to
pay $588,042 in penalties and faces up to 8 years in prison. Moreover,
the “Hot Lips” are no longer sealed – as part of his plea agreement,
Kramer is now aiding the government investigation into his affairs.
Sentencing
is set for February 6, 2015. We will keep you posted and are
especially interested if his cooperation with ongoing government tax
investigations will persuade the Court for a variance of the statutory
recommendation for sentencing. Moreover, we are also keeping an eye on
the 7th circuit's review of a 5k sentencing variance afforded to Ty
Warner in his case involving offshore bank accounts and tax evasion.
( See government's appeal of a sentencing involving tax evasion
/ Offshore Bank Accounts). It will be interesting to see how the
Appeals Court reviews the sentencing variance as to tax cases -
especially when one of the greatest factors involved in calculating
sentencing recommendations is the tax loss to the government. Click here to listen to the oral arguments.
http://taxlawyer.moskowitzllp.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.